[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: DEP5: License section

On ti, 2010-12-21 at 09:25 +1100, Craig Small wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 09:43:53PM +0000, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > * SPDX sometimes adds a license version, when we don't, or
> >   adds a ".0" to license version
> >   => ignore? the difference should not matter much
> >   => maybe suggest to SPDX they drop the ".0"
> I'd suggest that to SPDX but if they don't change just put in something
> that Foo-1.2 implies Foo-1.2.0 or even Foo-

Sure, that sounds reasonable.

> The rest of it I agree, the only thing is that any differences should be
> documented somewhere so when someone comes along to this standard they
> don't have to trawl debian-project email archives to work out why
> we have GFDL and SPDX has FDL (for example).
> A reference somewhere stating the differences would be enough, perhaps
> not in DEP5 itself, but somewhere, such as the wiki.

Good point. I added the list I currently have to the wiki[0] and
modified the DEP5 draft to include that link.

[0] http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat

Blog/wiki/website hosting with ikiwiki (free for free software):

Reply to: