On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 07:54:06PM +0000, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> The remaining parts of DEP5 are all related to licenses. I propose the
> following:
AFAICT, one of the example provided in the latest draft of DEP-5 does
not conform to the provisions described in DEP5 about license versioning
(e.g. it uses "GPL2+" instead of "GPL-2+").
The trivial patch attached fixes that.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Quando anche i santi ti voltano le spalle, | . |. I've fans everywhere
ti resta John Fante -- V. Capossela .......| ..: |.......... -- C. Adams
=== modified file 'dep5.mdwn'
--- dep5.mdwn 2010-11-20 09:21:21 +0000
+++ dep5.mdwn 2010-12-16 15:02:25 +0000
@@ -290,19 +290,19 @@
Files: *
Copyright: 1975-2010 Ulla Upstream
- License: GPL2+
+ License: GPL-2+
Files: debian/*
Copyright: 2010 Daniela Debianizer
- License: GPL2+
+ License: GPL-2+
Files: debian/patches/fancy-feature
Copyright: 2010 Daniela Debianizer
- License: GPL3+
+ License: GPL-3+
Files: */*.1
Copyright: 2010 Manuela Manpager
- License: GPL2+
+ License: GPL-2+
In this example, all files are copyright by the upstream and licensed
under the GPL, version 2 or later, with three exceptions.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature