Re: DEP-5: additional requirements to use with upstream
On pe, 2010-08-13 at 09:49 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> My opinion on this is that using # as a comment marker is already a
> diversion from RFC 5322 and I was surprised that dpkg had support for it.
> If we want this to be used outside of Debian, sticking strictly to the
> syntax for RFC 5322 headers seems like a good idea to me since we're
> staying with a format with known parsers.
I think I agree with Russ on this one. I'll propose a Comment: field