Moving discussions about DEP-5 details to another list. (Was Re: DEP-5 and public domain)
Le Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 04:27:09AM +0100, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
> On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 10:31 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Charles Plessy <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > > Le Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 02:05:42AM +1000, Ben Finney a écrit :
> > > > To my eye, ‘License: NO’ has exactly the wrong connotation (“the
> > > > recipient has no copyright license to this work”). The obvious
> > > > reaction to that would be “okay, then we can't have it in Debian”.
> > >
> > > there would still be no ambiguity
> > I'm not arguing that there's ambiguity; I'm arguing that the keyword
> > “no” is poorly chosen because it doesn't clearly connote what we want it
> > to.
> I think the bikeshed should be pink.
I think that we need a place to discuss such details, and definitely
debian-project is not appropriate.
Stefano, as admin of the DEP Alioth project (I think that the others retired),
would you agree to create a dedicated mailing list for DEP-5? I volunteer for
the mailman administration, and for taking the responsibility that no major
changes are discussed there instead of on debian-project.
Alternatively, we could use an existing list, for instance debian-legal.
Have a nice day,
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan