Re: buildd/porter/maintainer roles again
On 2010-07-12, Clint Adams <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:24:19PM +0300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> I think it should be. Or the porters should monitor the builds on their
>> architecture to be able to detect FTBFS and act on them, without the
>> maintainer having to manually ping them.
> If I were a porter, I would not bother doing this if the buildd admin
> did not care as much as a porter would; such inattention or apathy is
> very frustrating and makes one want to cease being a porter.
I do think that buildd admins that doesn't care for the architechture
they are buildd maintaining for should try hard handing over that
responsibility to someone who does care for the arch.