Le mercredi 19 août 2009 à 13:53 +0200, Bernhard R. Link a écrit : > Another speciality of that that seems to have gained momentum in the > last time (or perhaps I just cannot bear it as much as before), is > people invoking "bikeshadding". > Saying "I think this part makes no difference and there are more > important parts to consider and thus stop this dicussion" is a valid > thing (so if you mean that, why not say that instead). > But trying to escape a discussion by ridiculing people involved in > a way hard to contradict (One gives no facts[1] when one just call > something "bikeshadding", so one cannot be contradicted) makes me > only wish someone had the power to ban the one pulling the thread > off-topic by such behaviour. Bullshit. Just because someone found a word for a kind of disruptive behavior doesn’t mean this behavior didn’t exist before. The problem is not people invoking bikeshedding. The problem in itself is bikeshedding. And it’s far from a new problem. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in `- future understand things” -- Jörg Schilling
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=