Re: Debian decides to adopt time-based release freezes
On Mon, Aug 03 2009, Philipp Kern wrote:
> [ Please note that I'm taking all my hats off for this post, especially ]
> [ debian-release ones. ]
> On 2009-08-03, Sandro Tosi <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> What I'm wondering is: why should *we* adapt to ubuntu? why was not
>> ubuntu in the first place to accommodate our plans, instead of the
>> other way around? Why was not ubuntu that proposed "we freeze when
>> Debian freeze" but the opposite or so? since when upstreams make their
>> plans on downstreams?
> Well, there is a certain hope that upstreams above Debian would also
> adapt at some point.
They are far more likely to adapt, I would think, if Debian
sync's with RHEL, rather than Debian sync'ing with a Debian derivative.
If you mess with a thing long enough, it'll break. Schmidt
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C