Re: Re-thinking Debian membership - take #1: inactivity
On Fri, Jul 24 2009, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Fri Jul 24 08:43, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> I am not convinced of this. Infrastructure contributions are necessary and
>> valuable, but we don't admit people as Debian Developers on the basis of
>> infrastructure contributions, nor to work on infrastructure;
> They may need (depending what it is they do) Debian machine access,
> which is typically restricted to DDs (although I don't know whether
> specific exceptions are made).
Then that is also easily measured. We can easily log access to
restricted developer machines, and add that tot he mettric.
Don't tell me what you dreamed last night for I've been reading Freud.
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C