[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Results of the Lenny release GR

On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 03:58:03PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 02:22:44PM +0000, Ben Finney wrote:
>> Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> writes:
>> > Though there seem to be a number of people vocally wishing Robert
>> > would go away or the like, I have yet to see any substantive
>> > response to the questions he's raised in this thread.
>Number of people would like him to reconsider asking the questions just
>after a release, rather than just before.
>> My apologies: the current acting Secretary has, indeed, been engaging
>> substantively with the questions Robert has raised. However, as that
>> discussion continues, the questions don't seem much closer to
>> resolution.
>If you can't understand the "Please postpone the bikeshedding after the
>lenny release so that you'll have proper answers"-bit then I can nothing
>for you.


If things go much further we'll end up with enough seconds to force a
vote to "hand Robert Millan a nice cup of STFU". I'm hoping that's not
what anybody actually wants, but I can also understand why some people
might be feeling that way.

Robert, I appreciate that you believe you're doing the right thing
here, but attempting to continue this discussion right now, just after
the first vote that has already delayed Lenny, is not going to help
you or anybody. It *is* clear that a substantial majority of DDs want
us to release Lenny soon rather than attempt to fix every last
issue. Please drop it for now.

Steve McIntyre, Debian Project Leader <leader@debian.org>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: