Re: Discussion: Possible GR: Enhance requirements for General Resolutions
Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org> writes:
>>> this will mean that future GRs would need 30 other people to support
>>> your idea. While that does seem a lot (6times more than now),
>> Actually, 31 (depending on where you do the rounding/truncation which would
>> have to be specified or there will be arguments).
>
> floor() in this case. Well, my idea was just to "drop everything behind
> the .". So floor(), int(), whatever it is in your favorite language. :)
It's not so much the function as it is the order of operations. It sounds
like you meant 2 * floor(Q) instead of floor(2Q). :)
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: