[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Discussion: Possible GR: Enhance requirements for General Resolutions

Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org> writes:
> Or we have 2 vote options, one for 2Q, one for Q. What makes more sense?
> Guess changing mine, to avoid confusion/too many options?! (All just
> dreaming ahead to a possible vote :) )

I don't think having options for 2Q and Q for resolution sponsoring
makes the ballot too confusing, provided we don't end up with dozens
of options.

* Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P)  *
*           PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer           *

Reply to: