Re: Discussion: Possible GR: Enhance requirements for General Resolutions
>> Therefore the Debian project resolves that
>> a) The constitution gets changed to not require K developers to sponsor
>> a resolution, but floor(2Q). [see §4.2(1)]
>> b) Delaying a decision of a Delegate or the DPL [§4.2(2.2)],
>> as well as resolutions against a shortening of discussion/voting
>> period or to overwrite a TC decision [§4.2(2.3)] requires floor(Q)
>> developers to sponsor the resolution.
>> c) the definition of K gets erased from the constitution. [§4.2(7)]
> Thanks for bringing this up. I feel that 2Q is possibly too large
> however. I'd suggest:
> Therefore the Debian project resolves that:
> a) Section 4.2 of the Debian Constitution is amended, replacing all
> references to K with Q.
> b) 4.2.7 is reworded to state:
> Q is half of the square root of the number of current Developers.
> Q need not be an integer and is not rounded.
Interesting, that makes it harder to stop a delegate as compared to my
proposal. Not that thats bad. :)
> a) Q people should be enough to start a GR. The use of the "override a
> delegate's decision immediately" is something that should not be
> taken lightly. This should still require 2Q.
> b) No more reference to K, tidy up. Keep the non-rounded float nature
> of Q.
So, those that spoke up yet mostly think Q instead of 2Q for normal GRs.
Could change my text, its at least 3 times the size as of now, yes.
Or we have 2 vote options, one for 2Q, one for Q. What makes more sense?
Guess changing mine, to avoid confusion/too many options?! (All just
dreaming ahead to a possible vote :) )
* libpng2 no libpng3 no why ? because no yes no yes no yes bullshit no yes
no yes no yes stop ? no when someday beep beep beep beep (Closes: #157011)
-- Christian Marillat <email@example.com> Thu, 29 Aug 2002 16:41:58 +0200