Re: objecting to +nmuX syntax

To: debian-project@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: objecting to +nmuX syntax
From: Romain Francoise <rfrancoise@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 22:23:59 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 87abfiq8ww.fsf@elegiac.orebokech.com>
References: <[🔎] 20080811222853.GA23538@xanadu.blop.info> <[🔎] 20080812193717.GA23304@chistera.yi.org>

Adeodato Simó <dato@net.com.org.es> writes:

> I already objected to this in the past, and I'm loudly objecting
> again now. Some people on IRC shared this objection; I'm opening a
> subthread to see if I'm alone on this, or what.

In case anyone's interested in the context, the thread dato's
referring to starts at:

  http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2008/04/msg00124.html

And the +nmuX syntax originated in debchange, the rationale is here:

  http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/03/msg00498.html

Cheers,
-- 
Romain Francoise <rfrancoise@debian.org>
http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/

Reply to:

References:
- DEP1: Non Maintainer Uploads (final call for review)
  - From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>
- objecting to +nmuX syntax (was DEP1: Non Maintainer Uploads (final call for review))
  - From: Adeodato Simó <dato@net.com.org.es>

Prev by Date: Re: objecting to +nmuX syntax (was DEP1: Non Maintainer Uploads (final call for review))
Next by Date: Re: Direct commits to packages' VCS (Was: DEP1: Non Maintainer Uploads)
Previous by thread: Re: objecting to +nmuX syntax (was DEP1: Non Maintainer Uploads (final call for review))
Next by thread: Re: objecting to +nmuX syntax (was DEP1: Non Maintainer Uploads (final call for review))
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread