Re: infrastructure team procedures (fifth edit)
Holger Levsen wrote:
As I read it, the developers would - if this GR would be accepted as it is -
acknowledge, that some people seem to think they act - within their Debian
roles - outside Debians constitution.
And since we acknowledge this from now on, this practice becomes fine and
dandy??
I hope someone can come up with a construction wording and way out of this
dilemma.
We might fare well with
The Debian Prject clarifies that all privileged roles held on debian.org
machines are to be considered delegations by the DPL according to the
constitution, §....
as long as we trust ourselves not to elect DPLs going nuts with delegations.
Not to spoil the fun of seeing how far Josip can count by avoiding the simple
solution without extra safety nets (in addition to override by GR) at all cost.
But of course, Lucas received no response when proposing something similar (but
more specific and not mentioning delegation), and the objections to Clints
suggestion to not codify self-selection are likely to apply to this variant as
well. I would, however, appreciat if an option of the above type was provided if
it ever comes to a ballot over this.
Kind regards
T.
Reply to: