On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:35:16PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > On to, 2008-02-07 at 14:40 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > Overall, I think we are now in a "consensus reached" situation, we just > > need to implement the missing technicalities and then move on with DEP0 > > status. > > I agree, more or less. Since DEP0 is a bit of a special case, I think > that we should do at least a trial run by doing a DEP1 to see if the DEP > process actually works or not. What would be a good improvement to > Debian right now? Lucas Nussbaum and I are working on a proposal for clarifying NMU procedures. We shall probably request a DEP number soon. Thanks, Bas -- I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org). If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader. Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word. Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either. For more information, see http://pcbcn10.phys.rug.nl/e-mail.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature