Re: RFC: Introducing Debian Enhancement Proposals (DEPs)
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
I think the initial mail should be sended to debian-devel-announce
because there might be a lot of interested people who do not read
debian-project. At least I feel DEP0 should go initially to dda.
Or maybe, it could be "the list that the drivers prefer, with
This sounds even better. Or perhaps "the list the driver feels
apropriate". In several cases this might be debian-devel.
Some minor DEPs probably won't need a mail to d-d-a before they are
You are right. But I stick to it that DEP0 should go to d-d-a
because on one hand it is a DEP on the other hand it implements
DEP itself and thus is worth an implementation announcement that
concerns all people involved in Debian.
And having draft DEPs announced on d-d-a might be confusing:
some people might confuse them with accepted DEPs.
Agreed for DEPn (n > 0).