On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 10:39:53AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > So let me make a concrete proposal for a DPL delegation which I hope > will be adapted and adopted by Sam. As a general comment I like the idea of having such a committee and welcome your proposal. To the details ... > (5) Decide Its Own Procedure > > Provided the decisions are consistent with the above, and > provided that the Project Leader does not object, the Social > Committe may decide on: > (a) its own size, > (b) its own composition and manner of appointment, > (c) its own procedures for for decisionmaking, including > (d) how many of its members are required to agree on > which kinds of decisions, including > (e) whether to initially assign and empower a single committee > member to deal with each enquiry, and of course > (f) any appeals procedure(s) short of overturn via General > Resolution, and finally > (g) any similar matters regarding its own operation. I think we should mention here as an additional point "how to deal with conflict of interests", in case that one of the members of the committee is involved in a matter to be decided upon. Don't know if the TC has faced similar issues, but I think here is compelling. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what? zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ (15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the (15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature