[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: linhdd concerns



On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 11:08:33AM +0000, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> On Thursday 29 November 2007, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> > Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org> writes:
> > >   I know, but maybe (but that's sad if we need to do that) we should
> > > have overrides validated by the QA people … *sigh*.
> >
> > Should the override file have a justification field for each (error)
> > override? That would help generic DD's going through all override
> > files.
> 
> override files allow comments which means giving a justification is already 
> possible. So it seems this just needs to be documented as best practice?

  We definitely should have a lintian check for that !!! *cough*


-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

Attachment: pgpN5tGm3URfA.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: