[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: linhdd concerns

On Thursday 29 November 2007, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org> writes:
> >   I know, but maybe (but that's sad if we need to do that) we should
> > have overrides validated by the QA people … *sigh*.
> Should the override file have a justification field for each (error)
> override? That would help generic DD's going through all override
> files.

override files allow comments which means giving a justification is already 
possible. So it seems this just needs to be documented as best practice?
Cheers, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to: