Sam Hocevar wrote: > So, please let me know whether we'll have to fight, or if a few > things can still go smoothly. This is certainly no longer something > about which I can afford to wait 2 months between each answer from > you. Though I'm distant enough from the project to usually stay away from personal involvement, I can imagine this to be a serious issue. However, after reading the email through, I feel it could perhaps have been written in a less belligerent tone. Specially since it comes from the DPL, with the DPL hat on (as I understood from the "From" of the message). I know I'm fighting against the natural tide here, but just I'm trying to stop a possible flamewar before it starts, if at all possible, so couldn't this issue (of which I have no particular knowledge) be addressed in a somewhat different pace? If you disagree with my opinion that the tone of the email is perhaps a little too aggressive, please just disregard this email. I have no intention of lighting the fire myself. Hopefully I'm just being over-cautious. Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here]
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature