Re: [OT] time machine | was Debian Etch Stable.
- To: debian-project@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: [OT] time machine | was Debian Etch Stable.
- From: MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 15:50:21 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 467d332d.k8vgDGIyIcRbovb+%mjr@phonecoop.coop>
- In-reply-to: <1166110700.14184.207.camel@sokrates.home>
- References: <20061207133236.3037.qmail@hm317.locaweb.com.br> <87lklj5pl6.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <457D677B.20007@sukria.net> <20061212060253.GA26450@azure.humbug.org.au> <457e7cd1.PTPaP+jLPmrNOcCY%mjr@phonecoop.coop> <20061212110014.GA29194@azure.humbug.org.au> <457fff10.nUzqcMR2IczfVDbR%mjr@phonecoop.coop> <20061214053216.GA16125@azure.humbug.org.au> <4581252e.c8rTNYh7EufoAI6l%mjr@phonecoop.coop> <1166110700.14184.207.camel@sokrates.home>
Hans-Georg Bork <hgb@hgbhome.net> asked in a PS months ago:
> [...] did anyone ask FSF
> for the reason they paid Ian in the first year of debian (IIRC) ?
"We are distributing it as an interim measure until the GNU kernel (the
Hurd) is ready for users."
Source http://www.gnu.org/bulletins/bull18.html
--
MJR/slef
Reply to: