Re: Deficiencies in Debian
On Thu, 10 May 2007, gregor herrmann wrote:
> * I'd move the "Task description" to the top - IMO "what's it all
> about/what's the objective?" has the top-most priority.
Not really IMO. The very short description on the Teams page is enough to
understand what the team is about. This paragraph here is just a somewhat
more detailed reminder.
> * IMO the next step would be to define and publish similar pages not
> only for special teams but for all roles (be they teams or
> individuals) in Debian.
Sure. All roles should be teams anyway. :-)
> > I've documented the Alioth team and I'll probably continue doing something
> > similar for some other teams that I know quite well.
> I hope you do that for the Debian Perl Group so that I don't have to
> learn the wiki stuff ;-)
Actually, I probably won't. Packaging teams are not my priority in this
exercise. The real problems that we have are more in the teams that handle
> > I started it this week and I'd like to have some feedback on the structure
> > of the template page (see http://wiki.debian.org/TeamTemplate). Are the
> > important information missing? Are some information useless?
> I'm not sure if the "Usual roles" apply often to teams.
I think this is one of the most important section in those pages.
It documents who is the best point of contact for a specific task
and let outsiders check if there's an opportunity for him.
Of course, for packaging teams it might be less important.
Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux :