Hi, * Andreas Tille <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2007-04-10 13:22]: > On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, MJ Ray wrote: > > >The subject should be: SJVN flames debian again... does anyone > >care? > > Yes - as long there are some pure facts we should care. > I don't come to the same conclusion of the article author but > not to > care is the wrong reaction only because the author is known to > flame > Debian. We had lots of "thanks for the great release" which has > definitely reasons but we should not simply ignore critics. No especially not if I get: Configuration file `/etc/subversion/config' ==> Modified (by you or by a script) since installation. ==> Package distributor has shipped an updated version. What would you like to do about it ? Your options are: Y or I : install the package maintainer's version N or O : keep your currently-installed version D : show the differences between the versions Z : background this process to examine the situation The default action is to keep your current version. *** config (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [default=N] ? Y Installing new version of config file /etc/subversion/config ... dpkg: error processing subversion (--configure): unable to install updated status of `subversion': No such file or directory *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x08135de8 *** Aborted When updating to etch ;) Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - email@example.com - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
Description: PGP signature