Re: Why is there only self-nomination?
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 10:39:11PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Personally, I think the idea of a DD having to ack his nomination, though
> only after being nominated by some (Q?) fellow DDs would be better than a
> plain self-nomination. What do others think?
You don't want Q, Q is too much, it's 15/16 now. I think it's unreasonable
to expect someone to get fifteen votes before the voting has even started.
A requirement of 1, 2 or 3 seconds would be good. For example, we have one
NM advocate already, and a requirement for voting proposals to get five
seconds, and that works out all right.
2. That which causes joy or happiness.