Re: Why is there only self-nomination? [Re: Expulsion process: Sven Luther]
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: Why is there only self-nomination? [Re: Expulsion process: Sven Luther]
- From: Thijs Kinkhorst <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 10:30:53 +0100
- Message-id: <email@example.com>
- In-reply-to: <45E747FF.firstname.lastname@example.org>
- References: <200703011324.l21DORYa004917@cft.snafu.priv.at> <email@example.com> <20070301134517.GH2104@excelhustler.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <20070301145455.GB13970@azure.humbug.org.au> <20070301161448.GA23590@scowler.net> <45E747FF.firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 22:39 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Personally, I think the idea of a DD having to ack his nomination, though only
> after being nominated by some (Q?) fellow DDs would be better than a plain
> self-nomination. What do others think?
What would be better about it? I haven't seen any concrete problems yet
with the nominations. Last year (i.m.o.) a troll has nominated himself,
but he was convincingly voted down.
What concrete problem would this solve?
Description: This is a digitally signed message part