[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Social Committee proposal text (diff)

Josip Rodin <joy@entuzijast.net> writes:
> +    <p>The Social Committee may ask a Developer to take a particular social
> +    course of action even if the Developer does not wish to; this requires
> +    a 3:1 majority.</p>

OK, what happens if the Developer doesn't take the required course of
action? With the ctte it is easy, somebody does an NMU, but I don't
see how you can do something similar in social situations.

> +  <li>At least one third of all elected candidates should have been
> +  members of the project for at least Y/2 years, where Y is the age
> +  of the Project in years. If fewer than one third of candidates meet
> +  this requirement, the election process is repeated.</li>

Like Lars already said, this becomes an impossible requirement sooner
or later. A five year rule would be better, but even then this rule
may result in an impasse, if we don't have enough qualified candidates
who fullfil the requirement.

* Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P)  *
*           PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer           *

Reply to: