On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 11:50:41AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop> writes: > > If one considers appointing a DSA nagging assistant instead, then of > > course it's not worth doing! It seems to be miss the point, though. > > The problem is insufficient communication, not insufficient nagging. > > How, exactly, will that help the fact that new buildds are not > integrated in a timely manner (though this is not as much a DSA task as > one of the wanna-build admin)? Saying "Nothing has happened yet" is not > really fixing the problem. > Hi Marc, from my reading of this, folks are saying they want better _communication_ even if the problem is not fixed in a timely matter. The simple act of communicating will make the users feel _heard_ and not assume that there mail went to /dev/null, a spam filter or is actually being ignored. Users that are heard are far more _patient_ then those that are not feeling valued. Cheers, Kev -- | .''`. == Debian GNU/Linux == | my web site: | | : :' : The Universal | debian.home.pipeline.com | | `. `' Operating System | go to counter.li.org and | | `- http://www.debian.org/ | be counted! #238656 | | my keysever: pgp.mit.edu | my NPO: cfsg.org |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature