On Friday 22 December 2006 11:50, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop> writes: > > If one considers appointing a DSA nagging assistant instead, then of > > course it's not worth doing! It seems to be miss the point, though. > > The problem is insufficient communication, not insufficient nagging. > > How, exactly, will that help the fact that new buildds are not > integrated in a timely manner (though this is not as much a DSA task as > one of the wanna-build admin)? Saying "Nothing has happened yet" is not > really fixing the problem. I assume there's some DSA to-do list kept somewhere? And that it's either FIFO, or prioritized in some defined way? If the new assistant has access to that to-do list he could at least indicate howmany items are still in the DSA-queu before whatever request will be handled Dealing with incoming mail filtering out the relevant requests from spam, etc, and updating the to-dolist is probably also something that could be handled by the assistant -> even if the new assistant acts purely as a secretary this would be a huge improvement over the current situation where DSA is a huge blax box that either produces a change or doesn't. -- Cheers, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
Attachment:
pgp7Jrn0kcQs5.pgp
Description: PGP signature