Re: LSB 3.1 status for etch

To: Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
Cc: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>, debian-project@lists.debian.org, debian-lsb@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: LSB 3.1 status for etch
From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 14:13:03 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060806121303.GA8845@powerlinux.fr>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87lkq2dry3.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
References: <1154376134.6415.229.camel@localhost.localdomain> <[🔎] 2flmzaobym2.fsf@saruman.uio.no> <[🔎] 1154646875.6415.375.camel@localhost.localdomain> <[🔎] 2flu04sh41d.fsf@saruman.uio.no> <[🔎] 87lkq2dry3.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>

On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 01:28:04PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> What does the LSB 3.1 say about amd64 and libdirs? Does it require lib
> to contain 32bit libs?

Does this same question apply to other 64bit arches, like sparc64 or powerpc64
for example ? 

Friendly,

Sven Luther

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: LSB 3.1 status for etch
  - From: Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>

References:
- Re: LSB 3.1 status for etch
  - From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
- Re: LSB 3.1 status for etch
  - From: Jeff Licquia <licquia@debian.org>
- Re: LSB 3.1 status for etch
  - From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
- Re: LSB 3.1 status for etch
  - From: Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>

Prev by Date: Re: How to best reach the users of a package?
Next by Date: Re: How to best reach the users of a package?
Previous by thread: Re: LSB 3.1 status for etch
Next by thread: Re: LSB 3.1 status for etch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread