[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Reforming the NM process



On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 11:50:46PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> 
> This is already settled by the constitution: voting rights are by
> definition exactly with the DDs.
> 
> The question is just: When do we consider people to be DDs? This is not
> really defined, and we could make the gates more open (which I would
> prefer), but also close them even more. In the end, there is no correct
> answer, but just different preferences. Both directions are not "wrong"
> in a strictly technical sense.
> 
Hi Andreas,
it has been said that policy is based upon what thing people do and then
folks say 'that should be policy.' In this way, maybe each DD could
provide a short email of what they thinks make them a DD wrt skills or
other qualities and then try to make guidelines out of what folks says.
Cheers,
Kev

-- 
|  .''`.  == Debian GNU/Linux == |       my web site:       |
| : :' :      The  Universal     | debian.home.pipeline.com |
| `. `'      Operating System    | go to counter.li.org and |
|   `-    http://www.debian.org/ |    be counted! #238656   |
|     my keysever: pgp.mit.edu   |     my NPO: cfsg.org     |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: