Re: Explications needed...
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 06:17:20PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> [this discussion is off-topic on -devel, please follow-up on -project]
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 05:51:55PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > How did Aurelien get wanna-build access for his buildd
> He didn't, it's a rogue autobuilder. Which is the reason it got
> > or did he not ask for it...
> He did apparently, but did not get a response and decided to act anyway.
> Did somebody from the release team say that the arm autobuilder is
> causing trouble to the release, and that buildd maintenance needs to get
No. ARM was in no danger of being dropped from the release due to this, and
the only buildd problem I've seen identified in this was a broken
libtasn1-3 package in netwinder's chroot -- if this was causing any problems
for the release team, I at least wasn't aware of it.
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.