Re: Debian Etch Stable.
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 06:15:03PM +1000, Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 09:11:31AM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> > Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote:
> > > Personally, I'd say that now would be the time for any anti-payment
> > > people to say "we can do this better, and look, we'll prove it", and make
> > > up their own target date for etch, and demonstrate how much energy and
> > Now if only you could understand that we don't give a shit about the
> > release date, that would be a great step forward.
> > Only quality matters.
>
> Quality is not, and has never been, the question.
>
> The question is whether we can hit our quality target without forcing our
> users to put up with obsolete software -- either the previous release's
> because we keep delaying the release date, or the forthcoming release's
> because we have an overly extended freeze.
Which is why we release with gnome 2.14.
Mike
Reply to: