Re: DPL caretaking
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 16:13:58 -0400, Joey Hess <email@example.com> said:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
>> Sorry this took longer than I'd hoped. Anyway here's the caretaking
>> stuff so we can get on with the DPL recall vote stuff without
>> having to worry about things being left in the lurch. I'll be
>> trying to avoid exercising any DPL powers from now until the votes
>> are dealt with, assuming nothing insane pops up in the meantime.
> So 5 or Q or whatever it is people can block the DPL from doing
> anything for 1 or 2 months just by proposing a recall? Isn't that
Err, are you saying the DPL's decision is broken? Since it is
aj's decision you are questioning now.
As to the value of K, I think I would be happy with 2%
replacing the hard coded 5 (and let there be anther value for the
tech ctte if we need).
L = 5 or 2%, whichever is larger.
K = Q or L, whichever is smaller.
Of course, this probably means joeyh shall killfile this
thread too, since I am talking about the constitution.
The primary difference [...] is that the Java programm will reliably
and obviously crash, whereas the C Program will do something obscure
-- Java Language Tutorial
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C