[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The Sourceless software in the kernel source GR

Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> writes:

>         What is an issue is that a sloppy proposal mail may have
>  mislead the sponsors to believe that a preamble was an introductory
>  section, or vice versa. Hard to know unless the proposors and ponsors
>  are clear about their intent.

Right, so when you disambiguate (either way), especially if your
understanding differs from the proposer, it makes sense to check back
with the sponsors.  I don't see why that couldn't have been done in
this case.

Reply to: