[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Rethinking stable updates policy

Il giorno ven, 25/08/2006 alle 16.45 -0500, John Goerzen ha scritto:
>  * Updates must undergo testing, ideally with peer review

This could be impossible if stable and testing distributions are
binary-incompatible (ie. using different versions of glibc), just like
sarge and etch are in this moment.

Anyway, I mostly agree with your proposal, even if some of the points
you raised can be achieved using volatile.

Fabio Tranchitella <kobold@debian.org>                        .''`.
Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.            : :'  :
                                                             `. `'`
   http://people.debian.org/~kobold/                           `-
1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Questa =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente

Reply to: