On Aug 23, Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> wrote: > Indeed, but would it not make more sense, to aknowledge that the firmware is > non-free, and then argue that we should include it nonetheless, instead of > making obviously false claims like "firmware are not programs" ? "Firmwares are not programs *for the purpose of DFSG compliance*" is a statement which may or may not be true, but will not obviously false (or not) until we will known the outcome of this GR. I do not mind either way anyway, my purpose it to make Debian an useful and free (as-in-freedom) Linux distribution, not arguing about the general definition of the word "firmware". -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature