Re: Shouldn't we have more ftp masters ?
- To: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Cc: debian-project@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Shouldn't we have more ftp masters ?
- From: Thijs Kinkhorst <kink@squirrelmail.org>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 23:46:47 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 1149976007.8756.3.camel@darwin.os9.nl>
- In-reply-to: <20060531051058.GA9096@azure.humbug.org.au>
- References: <c4f6a84c0605281127v441b8e25yd5fe412ab9356ec7@mail.gmail.com> <20060528214216.GA9459@debian> <20060528232143.GC19008@aquarium.takhisis.invalid> <447B22D5.7070403@dlgeek.net> <2fllksjrihu.fsf@saruman.uio.no> <20060530122902.GE18897@country.grep.be> <87wtc31wqm.fsf@nurf.casa> <20060530134757.GG23704@chemicalconnection.dyndns.org> <20060531051058.GA9096@azure.humbug.org.au>
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 15:10 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> If you can't think of anything useful to do,
> you might like to look at http://ftp-master.debian.org/unmet-deps/ for
> a bunch of ftp-masterish problems that no one else is looking at much
> these days.
Might be a dumb question, but isn't this more the responsibility of the
respective maintainers than of the FTP-master? If so, wouldn't this be
better sorted by maintainer and/or linked from the PTS, than hidden in
some corner?
By the way, those files were most recently updated last July.
Thijs
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Reply to: