Re: Shouldn't we have more ftp masters ?
- To: Anthony Towns <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Cc: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: Shouldn't we have more ftp masters ?
- From: Thijs Kinkhorst <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 23:46:47 +0200
- Message-id: <email@example.com>
- In-reply-to: <20060531051058.GA9096@azure.humbug.org.au>
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20060528214216.GA9459@debian> <20060528232143.GC19008@aquarium.takhisis.invalid> <447B22D5.email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20060530122902.GE18897@country.grep.be> <email@example.com> <20060530134757.GG23704@chemicalconnection.dyndns.org> <20060531051058.GA9096@azure.humbug.org.au>
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 15:10 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> If you can't think of anything useful to do,
> you might like to look at http://ftp-master.debian.org/unmet-deps/ for
> a bunch of ftp-masterish problems that no one else is looking at much
> these days.
Might be a dumb question, but isn't this more the responsibility of the
respective maintainers than of the FTP-master? If so, wouldn't this be
better sorted by maintainer and/or linked from the PTS, than hidden in
By the way, those files were most recently updated last July.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part