On 06/05/06 23:59, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > I don't know how much work this is but given that the registration > document is rather long, do you think you could prepare an overview The simplified registration doc is on linuxdevices[1]. Sarge is mostly compliant with 2.0.2. Missing LSB compliance, and a slightly older glibc are most of the missing functionality. > where sarge falls short (and if the same applies for etch)? Looking at etch is the next step, against CGL 2.0.2 as well as the newer CGL specification 3.2. This is where the current/future is at. [1] http://linuxdevices.com/articles/AT7888570325.html Troy
Attachment:
pgpPjt3NBLpaQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature