On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 11:23:32AM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > Word from the DPL or SecTeam members would be welcome here - do they operate > under the assumption that the security team are delegates? For those who think it's worth delving into this topic, there's a message on -private from September 1999 that gives the alternative viewpoint; look for Resent-Message-ID: <cIDqoC.A.fQD.pAJ43@murphy>. I'd really much rather just avoid the question. > Back to the topic at hand: Can't Joeyh, Steve and Micah just be added to > the security team[1] Note that while I may've guessed wrong, I picked those three specifically as people who *wouldn't* want to be on the security team proper. :) (The idea behind that is, I guess, to ensure they don't fall victim to the conflict between spending time figuring out how to do the work, and spending time actually doing the work) Cheers, aj
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature