[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Stable security support

On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 11:23:32AM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> Word from the DPL or SecTeam members would be welcome here - do they operate 
> under the assumption that the security team are delegates?

For those who think it's worth delving into this topic, there's a message
on -private from September 1999 that gives the alternative viewpoint;
look for Resent-Message-ID: <cIDqoC.A.fQD.pAJ43@murphy>. I'd really much
rather just avoid the question.

> Back to the topic at hand:  Can't Joeyh, Steve and Micah just be added to 
> the security team[1] 

Note that while I may've guessed wrong, I picked those three specifically
as people who *wouldn't* want to be on the security team proper. :)

(The idea behind that is, I guess, to ensure they don't fall victim
to the conflict between spending time figuring out how to do the work,
and spending time actually doing the work)


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: