[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Ubuntu/Debian cooperation [was: Complaint about #debian operator]

On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 11:57:37AM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On 12/15/05, Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 01:06:51PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 01:57:12PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > > I don't disagree.  I would much rather every ubuntu change had a
> > > > corresponding patch filed in the BTS,
> > >
> > > Every "relevant" change put into the BTS would be nice, yes.  Filing
> >
> > Notice that it is official ubuntu directive to *NOT* do that, that is to not
> > send patches directly to the BTS,
> Please give a reference to this directive. I am part of the MOTU team,
> and have never heared about such a directive.

Hmm.  I'm pretty sure I've read it in a couple of places, but I've
definitely heard it from several Canonical employees -- I recall,
specifically, having a discussion with Robert Collins on the goods, bads,
and otherwises of the idea.  He seemed quite familiar with the whole

> > Friendly,
> sorry, this is unfriendly distribution of FUD.

Aaah, FUD -- the new Godwin.  I'd say you've racked up a couple of CoC
points there... <grin>

- Matt

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: