Re: GPL v3 process

To: debian-project@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: GPL v3 process
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 22:58:12 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 87y84858uj.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] dk8j0b$pum$3@sea.gmane.org> (Nathanael Nerode's message of "Tue, 01 Nov 2005 15:25:46 -0500")
References: <[🔎] 87u0exyina.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <[🔎] dk8j0b$pum$3@sea.gmane.org>

* Nathanael Nerode:

> Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> Do Debian or SPI participate in the GPL v3 process?
>> 
>> I think Debian should, to make sure that license compatibility does
>> not decrease substantially, and that things like the purported
>> anti-DRM clauses remain practical.
>
> We'd love to, but it's not a open process at this point.

Debian can participate in closed processes as well (and the process
seems to be open to invited individuals).  I just wanted to know if
Debian participates in this way.

Further discussion probably has to be moved to -private or -email
(thanks to Anthony for the pointer).

Reply to:

References:
- GPL v3 process
  - From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: GPL v3 process
  - From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>

Prev by Date: Re: DCCA name change and remaining issues
Next by Date: Re: DCC (Debian Confusion Core) trademark negotiation status
Previous by thread: Re: GPL v3 process
Next by thread: Re: GPL v3 process
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread