Re: Non-DDs as official Debian package maintainers
- To: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: Non-DDs as official Debian package maintainers
- From: "Adam D. Barratt" <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 10:47:21 +0100
- Message-id: <0ab001c5bf5b$53b754a0$eb00010a@andromeda>
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org><20050920201158.GB9375@squee.verizon.net><email@example.com><firstname.lastname@example.org><email@example.com><firstname.lastname@example.org><email@example.com><firstname.lastname@example.org><email@example.com><firstname.lastname@example.org><E1EIA8gemail@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <E1EILdK-0007UHemail@example.com>
[resent with correct From:]
On Thursday, September 22, 2005 8:36 AM, MJ Ray <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Jonas Smedegaard <email@example.com> wrote:
>> MJ Ray <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Tools like qa.debian.org tracks maintainers, not "signers". So for
>> each package I believe I must find the package in
>> packages.qa.debian.org, pick the upload message, decipher the GPG
>> signature... Right?
> No, you find the package's control file and look at the Uploader.
> packages.qa.debian.org shows this in "Co-maintainers" at present,
> for some reason.
Erm... because that's how policy defines the field. Section 5.6.3 -
to be precise.
Uploaders lists addresses which are not the address listed in Maintainer:
but from which uploads should not be considered NMUs. That effectively makes
those addressess co-maintainers (admittedly it may require a small leap to
extend that to "maintainer is a mailing list with named developers as
co-maintainers", but it's really not that difficult and more of a hop than a