On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 03:07:07PM +0200, Peter Vandenabeele wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 02:38:38PM +0200, Peter Vandenabeele wrote: > > So a naming in the sense of "Debian Commercial Support Association" > > or something along those lines would seem to make it clearer to me > ... or just stick to the original "DCC" as "Debian Commercial Consortium". Isn't it entirely plausible to be doing Debian "commercially" without wanting to be involved in the DCC? Isn't the DCC about standardising on some standard set of modified/updated packages for derivatives? More than just plausible, surely we expect a bunch of commercial types *not* to want to do this? Cheers, aj
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature