Re: Consultant entries that will be removed unless there is an email address provided
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 28-05-2005 15:41, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sat, 28 May 2005 11:38:14 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> *Sigh*. Do you generally make a practice of jumping to
> unwarranted conclusions? Who said that DD's are to be treated
Steve Langesek possibly (did you notice how I hoped to be wrong?) said
so: He picked a single entry from a longer list, emphasizing the roles
that entry plays in debian.
Wether or not unwarranted conclusions is generally my practice is for
others to judge, but in this particular case I believe not.
Please quote relevant parts when discussing.
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
- Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----