Re: Consultant entries that will be removed unless there is an email address provided
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 28-05-2005 07:04, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Fri, 27 May 2005 20:39:09 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
>>Your reaction sounded to me like you want Debian developers (and
>>especially ones with trusted jobs within our organisation?) treated
>>any different than other consultants. I disagree with that (and hope
>>I misunderstood you).
> Sounds more like apply common sense and utilize information
> you may have obtained from any other source, apart from the proper
> filing of the appropriate bureaucratic forms in triplicate. Or could
> you really have been under the misapprehension that Joey has fallen
> off the face of the earth, or is no longer with Debian?
I believe you cut out the part of my email were I explained what I mean.
No, I don't see the current guidelines as related to "bureaucratic forms
in triplicate". Rather, I see it as focusing on consultants interested
in email communication.
Participating in Debian - even doing highly trusted jobs - has shown to
be possible even without such interest.
I am not against relaxing the guidelines, but personally do not see the
current ones as problematic. What I *do* see as problematic is if we
treat Debian developers any different from outsiders on that list.
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
- Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----