Re: GFDL freedoms
Quoting Matthew Wilcox <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:05:07AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > But we *can* make people happy in this respect. It's possible for the
> > GFDL to achieve its goal without preventing this use case.
> I remain unconvinced that the freedoms required for documentation are
> the same freedoms required for software. I think the best way to fix
> the current situation is to propose the Debian Free Documentation
> Guidelines and modify the SC appropriately. More on this when I have
> a first draft.
This is great. Thanks in advance for your efforts.