Re: New policy for http://www.debian.org/consultants/
On Thursday 10 February 2005 08.55, Stefan Schleifer wrote:
> Tobias Toedter wrote:
> > On Tuesday 08 February 2005 23:30, MJ Ray wrote:
> >>Has the debian-consultants list been told about this discussion?
> > No, I didn't send my initial mail to that list. I've looked at the
> > archives and it seemed to me that -firstname.lastname@example.org is more or less
> > dead. It mostly consists of spam; some postings in September 2004 talk
> > about shutting the list down.
> > Cheers,
> shouldn't be a subscription to email@example.com a requirement
> for the listing on the webpage then? maybe we get more traffic on the
I'd rather the list be shut down. Forcing people to subscribe to a dead
list will only enlarge everybody's .procmailrc to /dev/null those mails.
Saying this differently: what type of traffic do you expect on the list when
consultants are force-fed it?
Beware of the FUD - know your enemies. This week
* Patent Law, and how it is currently abused. *