EWL HOWTO unsuitable counterarguments, was: Just a single Question for the Candidates
On 2004-03-04 16:04:15 +0000 Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org>
You should read the following chapter, that addresses
particularly your brand of protest:
Such a wash of illogic from someone normally ground in logic
smacks of denial.
Play fair! You should not criticise the PP for basing his argument on
one anecdote and then give a reference about one anecdote as a
counter-argument. I'm surprised they've not fixed that to
cross-reference the more substantial parts of the document.
Some parts of that HOWTO are good. Other parts are ridiculous, or as
discriminatory as the behaviour it complains about. It has some useful
info, but do not read it uncritically. I guess that's true for most
things, though, so I guess I'm advising readers not to discriminate
for it. ;-)
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ email@example.com
Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/