Hello, I have not yet made my mind up on this, but one thing is clear to me: Am Mi, den 28.01.2004 schrieb Branden Robinson um 19:04: > whether any sort of sanction should > take place as a result of these actions, and what standards of procedure > and courtesy we should have in team-maintained packages. In my opinion, and especially as this kind of thing has happened for the first time, there should be no sanction to dstone. If he has lost the XSF's trust, then thats their internal thing to decide - debian as a whole should not. (Not more than his may-be lowered reputation within debian - thats up to every single DD). Also, I don't think that we need to make our rules as who can upload what stricter or even install technical measures, nor should we set rules on how team maintenance has to work. We need to trust every developer that far and we have unstable as a buffer, so these rare problems don't hit most of our users. On the other hand, it might be useful to develop some "group maintenance template guidelines", which every team can derive their guideline from, but don't have to. Basically I want to say that we should continue to build on trust and meritocracy and not on rules and technical measuers. nomeata -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: joachimbreitner@amessage.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil