On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 02:33:57PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > Being aware that discussions had been held regarding the GFDL's > DFSG-freeness for a long time, one thought that occured to me was: is this > even the right approach? > > Towards that end, a couple of things occured to me: 1) documentation is not > actually software, and 2) if we assume that every bit of data in Debian is > Software, then we are distributing non-free software all over the place > (especially wrt license statements). I'm not going to respond to this message except to point you to this: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/debian-legal-200112/msg00250.html PLEASE NOTE: I no longer stand by my assertions in points 2) and 3) of the "impact statement", but I continue to stand by the "PROPOSAL" as such. If you'll rebut that message, I'll rebut yours. -- G. Branden Robinson | It doesn't matter what you are Debian GNU/Linux | doing, emacs is always overkill. branden@debian.org | -- Stephen J. Carpenter http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpg1aMJITCPv.pgp
Description: PGP signature